Vince Li is unpredictably dangerous. Dr Yaren’s own testimony at the “trial” stated that Vince Li could suffer a relapse even while medicated, at any point in time in the future and that he could suffer a psychotic break as severe as the extremely inhumane episode that took Tim’s life.
Timothy suffered that particular Psychotic break… who could be the next to suffer Vince Li’s next psychotic break? Timothy’s human rights are the ones that were violated. Vince Li’s rights should not be considered more important here.
Canada needs to build a separate facility to house criminally insane offenders. A very secure facility with fenced and monitored outdoor area where they can receive as much time outside as treatment requires them to receive. A facility where they are detained for the rest of their natural lives. The “patient” gets the humane treatment and the public safety is protected.
If the insane individual commits a very violent murder, that murderer insane, or not should never be free to repeat that behavior. A life for a life. Thats my opinion I am not stigmatizing anyone.
Li did it… Li may not be psychologically accountable but he is still criminally responsible. Thats why he goes before a criminal review board now. HE STILL COMMITTED THE CRIME OF MURDER and he needs to be held responsible for that.
The whole issue of NCR needs to be looked into and changed by the politicians who have the power to do it.
A young lady writing her thoughts on the Vincent Li Review Board Hearing eloquently expressed her opinion, reasoning, and agreement with the professionals charged with the assessment, and treatment of Vincent Li.
In her concluding statement she raised a point that strikes at the very heart of much of the debate surrounding individuals such as Vincent Li.
Brittany writes ” I’m a bit confused as to why they are making such a fuss about a guy walking outside for 15 minutes when they should be investigating how a person who was previously under the care of our mental health system could be released to commit such a horrific act in the first place.”
For many people there is an inherent distrust in the ability of of these “professionals” to adequately determine the “fitness” of these individuals to live amongst the general public.
The prosecution at the original “trial” was an inept show where everyone was in agreement and slapping themselves on the back for a job well done… a 2nd degree murder charge when the perpetrator acquires a weapon prior to boarding the bus?.. or the newspaper article he was allegedly reading in the days prior to the crime… allegedly because there never was a venting of the facts..
So the question of his first release may raise another question… did the professionals examine Li and find no condition requiring treatment? Again with no evidence presented at a “trial”, we are left to ponder.
Another “expert” (Dr Stanley Yarin) last year declared that under his care Li was responding well to treatment… after little more than a couple of sessions!
And now Dr Kremer has found that some sunlight and exercise may be just what the doctor ordered.
Excuse my skepticism but doctors with egotistical narcissistic personalities rushing to declare that they have “cured” persons who have committed heinous crimes does not bolster my confidence.
These professionals first need to actually perform their roles and duties with a sense of due diligence. That may actually inspire the general public to actually have some confidence in their ability to successfully diagnosis the subjects in their care.